Squeezing the Squeezed
In
contemporary society, we seem to be operating under a harsh and regressive
principle: those who are already burdened must be burdened further, especially
if their ability to resist is minimal. This unfortunate trend is particularly
evident in Pakistan, where increases in taxes, electricity bills, and
deductions in salaries disproportionately target government employees, most
notably those in the education and healthcare sectors. These individuals,
rather than being supported, have become the most convenient scapegoats for the
state's financial imbalances.
This
situation is reminiscent of an Indian film in which a state Raja repeatedly
raises taxes to fund his ambitions, ignoring the suffering of his people. Each
time they protest, he uses force to extract more from them. Similarly, in our
context, whenever the government faces a financial shortfall or budgetary gap,
the immediate response is to cut into the earnings and benefits of public
servants. It appears the state is never hesitant to wield its metaphorical
sword against the very people who have served it faithfully.
Government
employees already pay a disproportionate share of taxes and fulfill remittance
obligations more consistently than any other segment of society. Yet, their
financial futures are now under severe threat. Pensions, gratuities, and other
post-retirement allowances are being slashed arbitrarily and without
transparent justification. Historically, public sector employment was desirable
because it offered a sense of financial security after retirement, typically
after 35 or more years of dedicated service. Today, even that sense of security
is rapidly eroding.
A
particularly troubling example is the recent elimination of Leave Encashment, a
policy through which employees were compensated for unused leave. The
government has now replaced this with the Leave Preparatory to Retirement (LPR)
system, which denies financial compensation even to those who diligently saved
their leave. Gratuity payments have also been drastically reduced, and pension
percentages are declining. These policy shifts have understandably created
panic among those scheduled to retire in 2025 or in the coming months.
This
sense of uncertainty is compounded by the broader economic crisis: spiraling
inflation, record-high taxes, skyrocketing food and energy prices, and
increasingly unaffordable healthcare. Retired employees, often elderly and
vulnerable, are now left to navigate a hostile economic landscape with
diminishing resources. Rather than being rewarded for decades of service, they
are met with neglect and financial insecurity.
What
is particularly egregious is that the government has also refused to release
group insurance payments and has withdrawn several allowances—such as the Discrepancy
Allowance, which continue to be paid in other provinces. The result is not only
declining morale but also a decline in the quality of work in essential sectors
like education and health.
These
developments have serious social and psychological repercussions. In the past,
individuals worked hard to secure admission to higher education institutions
and eventually land government jobs, encouraged by the promise of long-term
stability. Now, seeing the deteriorating conditions of public sector retirees,
many young people are disillusioned. They are turning instead to vocational
skills or private enterprises, seeking immediate income over long-term service.
The
irony is staggering. Government employees are the only segment of society from
whom taxes are deducted directly from their salaries. Yet, they are taxed again
and again—on purchases, ATM use, banking transactions, telecommunications, and
digital services. Meanwhile, powerful groups such as industrialists, traders,
large landowners, and even professionals often pay little to no taxes. Many
enjoy state-subsidized perks like free electricity and fuel, all while evading
tax obligations through loopholes and underreporting.
Given
these realities, it is imperative for the state to recognize and fulfill its
responsibilities to government employees. The state must ensure that those who
contribute most consistently and honestly to national revenue are not abandoned
in retirement. Through mechanisms such as mutual funds, pension insurance
schemes, or public-private partnerships, sustainable support systems must be
established for retirees. In Pakistan, finding employment post-retirement is
nearly impossible. Older individuals face health issues, mental stress, and
often a deep sense of loss and nostalgia, making re-entry into the workforce an
unrealistic expectation.
It
is therefore not only a matter of economic justice but of moral duty for the
government to support its retired employees. These individuals have served the
nation for decades and deserve dignity, security, and care, not abandonment and
uncertainty.